Tomas Minc

This creator ranks 543 out of 795 tracked accounts and holds a subscriber count that is 0.6 times the median size of our typical creators. This verified account sits in the Mid-Tier category without a defined niche. While average views per Spotlight post exceed the median, the engagement rate falls below the median of 3.52 percent. The report continues by breaking down specific audience demographics and historical performance trends.

Average views for @tomasminc reach 222.6K and sit above the median of 210.2K at rank 386 of 795. The engagement rate of 1.23% falls below the 3.52% median with a rank of 311 of 400, meaning the audience reacts less than usual. Reach reliability is low as only 7.7% of posts doubled the account average and 3.8% quintupled it. This data indicates a tap-and-scroll audience.

Tomasminic generates revenue through the Spotlight reward fund for high view counts and sponsorship deals based on total reach. A sponsored post is priced between $2.8K and $5.2K based on their 345.3K subscribers. Their rank of 543 puts them below the median, meaning the quoted range serves as a ceiling to bargain under rather than a fixed fee. This position makes them a value buy for brands seeking reach at a lower cost point. The 1.23% engagement rate falls well below the 3.52% median. This low interaction rate suggests that while the view count is high, the audience does not interact frequently with the content. The sponsorship band may therefore be less justified than the raw numbers suggest. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Audience & Reach

The subscriber count ranks below the median for tracked creators. This positioning indicates an audience that is smaller than the typical broadcaster scale despite the verified status of the account. Because no specific category is set, the audience profile remains broad and lacks a defined niche focus. The engagement rate falls well below the industry median. This gap suggests that brand messages will land with less impact compared to typical benchmarks for this size of reach. The discrepancy between the verified status and the low interaction rates means the content reaches a wide net but does not trigger high levels of activity from the viewers. The data points toward a passive audience rather than an active one. Given the lack of category data and the lower engagement figures, this audience fits few specific brand categories.