Scott van-der-Sluis

This creator ranks 713 out of 872 tracked accounts and holds a subscriber count that is less than half the size of the median profile. As a verified Mid-Tier account without a defined category, Scott van-der-Sluis maintains a presence that sits below average in both reach and interaction metrics. Average Spotlight views fall below the median while the engagement rate also trails the typical benchmark. Growth data is unavailable for this period. The following report breaks down the specific performance metrics and audience interaction patterns.

Average views for @scottvds17 sit at 137.9K, which is below the median of 207.7K and ranks 661 out of 872. The engagement rate of 2.59% falls behind the 3.74% median, ranking 307 out of 477. This indicates that the audience reacts less than usual compared to other creators. Only 25.0% of posts reached double the account average while none reached five times the average. These figures suggest that reach is inconsistent and rarely spikes beyond standard expectations. The lack of high-performing outliers points toward a stable but stagnant reach profile. This data indicates a tap-and-scroll audience.

Scott earns primarily through brand sponsorships driven by his 137.9K average views per post. His sponsored content sits in a range of $1,700 to $3,300 based on his 218.0K subscribers. Because the account ranks below the median at 713 of 872, the quoted band serves as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a starting point. The engagement rate of 2.59% falls below the 3.74% median, which suggests that his reach may not justify the top end of his price bracket. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Audience & Reach

The audience size is below the typical tracked creator average. The rank indicates this account operates at a scale smaller than the median despite its verified status. While verification confirms a level of platform recognition, the lack of a set category makes specific niche targeting difficult to confirm. Engagement rates fall below the median, meaning brand messages may land softer than they would with an average creator in this tier. The count is stable but does not suggest high interaction frequency relative to total reach. Data suggests a broad but less active viewer base. This audience fits few specific brand categories without additional context on content themes.