Ben Fjeld

This creator ranks 445 out of 609 tracked accounts and holds a subscriber count that is 0.5x the median size of our tracked creators, making it smaller than the typical profile we monitor. The account is verified and sits within the Mid-Tier category. Average views per Spotlight post are double the median while the engagement rate exceeds the median by over two percentage points. This indicates a reach that performs well above average benchmarks. The remaining report details the specific growth patterns and audience interaction metrics found in the data.

Average views of 440.3K sit well above the median and place the account at rank 154 out of 609. The engagement rate of 5.41% beats the 3.44% median to earn a rank of 51 out of 148. This confirms that the audience interacts with content more than the typical user base. Reach reliability remains low as only 12.9% of posts doubled the account average while 6.5% reached five times the average. Most content performs consistently but rarely breaks into viral territory. The data indicates an active audience.

The account maintains a strong reach with average views exceeding its subscriber count by nearly double. One specific post reached 4.5 million views, which is over ten times the typical performance of this account. This outlier indicates that certain pieces of content can break through much wider than the standard daily output. The repeated use of Original Sound by benfjeld01, William Tell Overture, and Monkeys Spinning Monkeys suggests a reliance on established audio patterns to drive consistent reach. These recurring sounds function as recognizable markers within the feed. While individual posts perform well, the large gap between average views and the top post shows a high variance in content success. The account currently maintains an average of 440.3K views per post.

The content cadence for @benfjeld01 follows an erratic pace. This status stems from the lack of captured timestamps making a steady rhythm impossible to confirm. The account ranks in the middle of the pack at 445 out of 609 for its posting frequency relative to the median. New content lands most often on Friday and Saturday. The busiest hour for new uploads is 22:00 UTC. Because the cadence is inconsistent, a marketer cannot rely on a predictable weekly cycle to time a campaign. You should monitor the account specifically during the identified weekend windows to catch fresh Spotlight posts. Planning a tie-in requires manual monitoring rather than relying on a fixed schedule. The mid-range subscriber rank suggests that while content exists, it does not follow a high-frequency output model. You must coordinate activations based on these specific peaks rather than assuming a daily presence.

The primary revenue stream for @benfjeld01 stems from brand sponsorships driven by reach rather than Spotlight rewards. A sponsored post sits in the $1,800 to $3,400 range based on the subscriber count of 228.5K. Because this creator ranks below the median at 445 out of 609, their position suggests a value play for advertisers. The quoted band acts as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a fixed fee. This lower rank means the brand pays for volume rather than prestige. However, an engagement rate of 5.41% exceeds the 3.44% median. This higher interaction rate justifies the upper end of the pricing bracket despite the lower ranking. The data suggests the audience interacts with content more frequently than average peers. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Audience & Reach

The verified status confirms this creator has achieved a level of reach beyond standard hobbyist levels despite the total subscriber count being half of the typical benchmark for tracked creators. This size indicates an audience that is smaller than the median but established enough to maintain a professional profile. The engagement rate sits well above the median, which means brand messages land harder here than they do on average across the platform. High engagement relative to the follower count suggests the content reaches a specific group of people who interact with the posts at a higher frequency than typical users. This performance gap indicates that while the total reach is not broad scale, the impact per view is stronger. The audience fits the travel and lifestyle category best based on the verified status and interaction rates.