@wade1.2 vs @obeyarrick

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 34 and 58 Spotlight posts we have collected, @wade1.2 averages 153.4K views per post and @obeyarrick 11.6K; engagement is 9.41% against 10.12%.

@wade1.2

Wade Richardson

@wade1.2 ●

Link in bio for more

View full profile →
@obeyarrick

Arrick 🥴

@obeyarrick ●

TikTok: @obeyarrick 🎵 Instagram: @arrickobey 📸

View full profile →
@wade1.2 Metric @obeyarrick
0 Subscribers 134.4K
34 Spotlight Posts 58
5.1M Total Views 558.2K
153.4K Avg Views / Post 11.6K
3.2M Best Post Views 128.2K
9.41% Engagement Rate (%) 10.12%
0 Subscribers per Post 2.3K

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @wade1.2 gets 2.0x the views of @obeyarrick (7,411 against 3,727 for the middle post).

@wade1.2: Across the 32 of its 34 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 7,411 views, while the average is 158,240: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 64% of these views. The most-viewed post (3,222,694 views) went up on December 19, 2024. The collected posts run from December 19, 2024 to September 27, 2026.

@obeyarrick: Across the 47 of its 58 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 3,727 views, while the average is 11,877: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 23% of these views. The most-viewed post (128,203 views) went up on September 8, 2026. The collected posts run from December 18, 2025 to October 12, 2026. Subscribers went from 135,100 on May 11, 2026 to 134,400 on October 27, 2026 (-0.5%).

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @wade1.2 and @obeyarrick.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.