@lavabladezz vs @thatssomid

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 12 and 72 Spotlight posts we have collected, @lavabladezz averages 111.7K views per post and @thatssomid 9.7K; engagement is 8.29% against 2.21%.

@lavabladezz

Lava Bladez

@lavabladezz

View full profile β†’
@thatssomid

That’s So Mid

@thatssomid

Theme Parks 🎒 Attractions 🎑

View full profile β†’
@lavabladezz Metric @thatssomid
0 Subscribers 7.6K
12 Spotlight Posts 72
1.3M Total Views 523.2K
111.7K Avg Views / Post 9.7K
668.9K Best Post Views 104.6K
8.29% Engagement Rate (%) 2.21%
0 Subscribers per Post 106

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @lavabladezz gets 13.4x the views of @thatssomid (44,323 against 3,300 for the middle post).

@lavabladezz: Across the 11 of its 12 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 44,323 views, while the average is 121,908: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 50% of these views. The most-viewed post (668,862 views) went up on March 20, 2026. The collected posts run from February 18, 2026 to May 29, 2026.

@thatssomid: Across the 50 of its 72 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 3,300 views, while the average is 10,465: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 20% of these views. The most-viewed post (104,605 views) went up on March 3, 2026. The collected posts run from February 26, 2026 to October 11, 2026. Subscribers went from 5,900 on May 12, 2026 to 7,600 on October 25, 2026 (+28.8%).

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @lavabladezz and @thatssomid.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views Γ— 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.