Beauty Fix

The @beautyfixshow account ranks 568 out of 609 tracked creators and holds a subscriber count that is 0.3 times the median size of our typical creator. This verified profile sits in the Mid-Tier category without a specified niche. While the engagement rate of 3.35% falls just below the 3.44% median, the average views per Spotlight post are more than double the median reach. The upcoming report provides a deeper look into these performance metrics and audience interactions.

The average reach for @beautyfixshow sits at 482.7K views, which is more than double the median and places the account in rank 142 of 609. Engagement rates fall slightly behind the median at 3.35% compared to 3.44%, ranking 80 out of 148. This suggests that while the content reaches a wide audience, the interaction rate remains just below average for the platform. Reach reliability is low because only 14.3% of posts exceeded double the account average, and no posts reached five times the typical view count. These figures indicate consistent but capped performance rather than unpredictable spikes. The data points toward a tap-and-scroll audience.

The account achieves high reach relative to its subscriber count with average views reaching 482.7K per post. A standout post reached 2 million views, which is over four times the typical engagement for this creator. Two specific audio tracks appear frequently in the data. The use of Original Sound by Snapchatter and the Rockwell track Somebody's Watching Me indicates a reliance on recurring sound trends to maintain reach. These figures confirm that while the average performance is strong, certain posts successfully break into much higher tiers of visibility. The account maintains a consistent presence with 123.4K subscribers.

The content cadence for @beautyfixshow follows a sparse high-effort pace. This classification stems from the account ranking in the bottom tier of total posts per week relative to the median. While the creator is not active daily, the data indicates specific windows where new material appears. New Spotlight content lands most frequently on Wednesday and Friday. The busiest hour for fresh uploads occurs at 03:00 UTC. Because the posting frequency ranks 568 out of 609, a marketer should not expect constant daily volume from this creator. Campaigns must be planned around these specific mid-week and weekend windows to align with new content drops. A steady presence is missing here, so timing becomes critical for any brand tie-in. You cannot rely on a consistent daily rotation to maintain visibility. Instead, focus your strategy on the identified upload days to capture the highest concentration of fresh content. The low rank in frequency suggests that when @beautyfixshow does post, it is a deliberate choice rather than a routine habit.

The primary revenue stream for @beautyfixshow is driven by sponsorships based on total reach. A sponsored post sits in a band of $987 to $1,900. This creator ranks 568 out of 609 and falls below the median rank. Because they sit in the lower half of the rankings, their quoted range functions as a ceiling for negotiations rather than a guaranteed fee. The engagement rate of 3.35% is nearly identical to the 3.44% median. This consistency suggests that the reach translates into standard interaction levels for the price point. These are modelled estimates from public metrics, not disclosed earnings.

Audience & Reach

The subscriber count sits at less than a third of the typical creator on this platform. This ranking places the account well below the broadcast scale threshold despite its verified status. Because no specific category is assigned to the profile, the audience composition remains broad and undefined. The engagement rate sits slightly below the median mark for the platform. This indicates that brand messages will land with a standard level of impact rather than gaining extra traction from high interaction rates. The lack of a defined niche suggests a general interest group rather than a targeted community. Given these metrics, the audience fits few specific categories.