@tessapeay vs @milkydews

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

@tessapeay has 36.5K subscribers and @milkydews has 104.2K, so @milkydews has 2.9x as many. Across the 19 and 26 Spotlight posts we have collected, @tessapeay averages 173.6K views per post and @milkydews 83.6K; engagement is 4.80% against 0.47%.

@tessapeay

Tessa Peay

@tessapeay

Hair care fashion & whatever else inspires me ๐Ÿซถ

View full profile โ†’
@milkydews

MilkyDew

@milkydews โ—

๐Ÿฅ›skincare reccs for your skin needs โ‹†๐™šโ‚ŠหšโŠน TikTok/YouTube: @milkydew Instagram: @milkydew_

View full profile โ†’
@tessapeay Metric @milkydews
36.5K Subscribers 104.2K
19 Spotlight Posts 26
3.3M Total Views 2.2M
173.6K Avg Views / Post 83.6K
1.4M Best Post Views 454.0K
4.80% Engagement Rate (%) 0.47%
1.9K Subscribers per Post 4.0K

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @tessapeay gets 1.8x the views of @milkydews (103,765 against 59,000 for the middle post).

@tessapeay: Across the 18 of its 19 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 103,765 views, below the average of 183,221, which the bigger posts pull up. The most-viewed post (1,447,351 views) went up on March 15, 2026. The collected posts run from February 26, 2026 to March 17, 2026. Subscribers went from 31,200 on May 8, 2026 to 36,500 on October 21, 2026 (+17.0%).

@milkydews: Across all 26 of the Spotlight posts we have collected, the middle post has 59,000 views, below the average of 83,612, which the bigger posts pull up. The most-viewed post has 454,000 views.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @tessapeay and @milkydews.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views ร— 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.