@rdx_gulshan50 vs @gabrusdwivedi

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 32 and 49 Spotlight posts we have collected, @rdx_gulshan50 averages 349.6K views per post and @gabrusdwivedi 138.0K; engagement is 3.82% against 3.29%.

@rdx_gulshan50

rdx_Gulshan1

@rdx_gulshan50

View full profile →
@gabrusdwivedi

Gabrus Dwivedi

@gabrusdwivedi

View full profile →
@rdx_gulshan50 Metric @gabrusdwivedi
34.4K Subscribers 0
32 Spotlight Posts 49
10.5M Total Views 6.6M
349.6K Avg Views / Post 138.0K
2.5M Best Post Views 1.1M
3.82% Engagement Rate (%) 3.29%
1.1K Subscribers per Post 0

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @rdx_gulshan50 gets 2.8x the views of @gabrusdwivedi (114,074 against 40,351 for the middle post).

@rdx_gulshan50: Across the 29 of its 32 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 114,074 views, while the average is 361,704: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 24% of these views. The most-viewed post (2,542,947 views) went up on July 13, 2026. The collected posts run from July 2, 2026 to October 6, 2026. Subscribers went from 31,500 on September 19, 2026 to 34,400 on October 22, 2026 (+9.2%).

@gabrusdwivedi: Across the 47 of its 49 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 40,351 views, while the average is 140,961: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 16% of these views. The most-viewed post (1,051,836 views) went up on August 6, 2026. The collected posts run from July 17, 2026 to October 23, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @rdx_gulshan50 and @gabrusdwivedi.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.