@raghad.tatari vs @rula.kasem

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 19 and 16 Spotlight posts we have collected, @raghad.tatari averages 418.1K views per post and @rula.kasem 13.4K; engagement is 0.56% against 1.67%.

@raghad.tatari

رغد فاميلي في هولندا🇳🇱

@raghad.tatari ●

اخصائية تجميل وصانعة محتوى على اليوتيوب 1.5m🎬 https://youtube.com/@raghode للتواصل والإعلانات: 🚨 راح شارككون كل شي بتحبوه💖

View full profile →
@rula.kasem

رولا قاسم في دبي 🇦🇪

@rula.kasem ●

‏‏Youtuber +10M , مهندسة معمارية 📍Dubai 🇦🇪 ‏‎للاعلانات 📧

View full profile →
@raghad.tatari Metric @rula.kasem
0 Subscribers 445.1K
19 Spotlight Posts 16
7.5M Total Views 215.1K
418.1K Avg Views / Post 13.4K
3.1M Best Post Views 48.2K
0.56% Engagement Rate (%) 1.67%
0 Subscribers per Post 27.8K

What the posts and readings show

Their typical posts are close: the middle post has 9,329 views for @raghad.tatari and 10,954 for @rula.kasem.

@raghad.tatari: Across the 17 of its 19 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 9,329 views, while the average is 442,698: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 41% of these views. The most-viewed post (3,085,050 views) went up on September 10, 2024. The collected posts run from September 10, 2024 to October 19, 2026.

@rula.kasem: Across all 16 of the Spotlight posts we have collected, the middle post has 10,954 views, close to the average of 13,445. The most-viewed post (48,156 views) went up on August 31, 2026. The collected posts run from August 30, 2026 to September 5, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @raghad.tatari and @rula.kasem.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.