@pixelpop4499 vs @woldnedap

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 85 and 16 Spotlight posts we have collected, @pixelpop4499 averages 146.2K views per post and @woldnedap 1.5K; engagement is 0.84% against 0.79%.

@pixelpop4499

Pixelpop

@pixelpop4499

"Bringing pixels to life! 🎨✨ Daily creative snaps, digital art, and design inspiration. Follow for a pop of creativity!"

View full profile →
@woldnedap

Wold Nedap

@woldnedap

loveeee

View full profile →
@pixelpop4499 Metric @woldnedap
9.1K Subscribers 0
85 Spotlight Posts 16
7.5M Total Views 6.2K
146.2K Avg Views / Post 1.5K
2.5M Best Post Views 2.4K
0.84% Engagement Rate (%) 0.79%
107 Subscribers per Post 0

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @pixelpop4499 gets 5.5x the views of @woldnedap (7,552 against 1,380 for the middle post).

@pixelpop4499: Across the 50 of its 85 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 7,552 views, while the average is 149,113: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 33% of these views. The most-viewed post (2,488,288 views) went up on August 6, 2026. The collected posts run from April 4, 2025 to October 20, 2026. Subscribers went from 9,000 on September 6, 2026 to 9,100 on October 22, 2026 (+1.1%).

@woldnedap: Across the 4 of its 16 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 1,380 views, close to the average of 1,542. The most-viewed post (2,365 views) went up on September 10, 2026. The collected posts run from September 8, 2026 to September 11, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @pixelpop4499 and @woldnedap.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.