@luvgill86 vs @navbhatthal

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

@luvgill86 has 108.3K subscribers and @navbhatthal has 106.5K. Across the 62 and 34 Spotlight posts we have collected, @luvgill86 averages 140.5K views per post and @navbhatthal 9.5K; engagement is 3.41% against 6.67%.

@luvgill86

Love Gill

@luvgill86

love giill

View full profile →
@navbhatthal

ਨਵਕਿਰਨ ਕੌਰ ਭੱਠਲ

@navbhatthal

Artist 🎭

View full profile →
@luvgill86 Metric @navbhatthal
108.3K Subscribers 106.5K
62 Spotlight Posts 34
8.7M Total Views 324.6K
140.5K Avg Views / Post 9.5K
1.0M Best Post Views 29.9K
3.41% Engagement Rate (%) 6.67%
1.7K Subscribers per Post 3.1K

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @luvgill86 gets 10.4x the views of @navbhatthal (76,617 against 7,361 for the middle post).

@luvgill86: Across the 61 of its 62 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 76,617 views, below the average of 142,840, which the bigger posts pull up. The most-viewed post (1,000,707 views) went up on September 28, 2026. The collected posts run from August 28, 2026 to October 22, 2026. Subscribers went from 81,900 on September 14, 2026 to 108,300 on October 23, 2026 (+32.2%).

@navbhatthal: Across the 33 of its 34 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 7,361 views, below the average of 9,836, which the bigger posts pull up. The most-viewed post (29,938 views) went up on June 7, 2026. The collected posts run from April 15, 2026 to October 4, 2026. Subscribers went from 107,400 on September 12, 2026 to 106,500 on October 15, 2026 (-0.8%).

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @luvgill86 and @navbhatthal.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.