@kalhf1999 vs @radad543210

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 183 and 28 Spotlight posts we have collected, @kalhf1999 averages 175.8K views per post and @radad543210 108.7K; engagement is 1.14% against 1.51%.

@kalhf1999

90Plus

@kalhf1999

🌍 من الملاعب إلى شاشتك. ⚡ كل مباراة لها قصة... ونحن نرويها 🫵

View full profile →
@radad543210

المنصة الرياضة

@radad543210

شخصية رياضية ⚽️اشتراكك واستمتع 🍿⚽️

View full profile →
@kalhf1999 Metric @radad543210
10.3K Subscribers 0
183 Spotlight Posts 28
3.9M Total Views 1.5M
175.8K Avg Views / Post 108.7K
2.6M Best Post Views 667.4K
1.14% Engagement Rate (%) 1.51%
56 Subscribers per Post 0

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @kalhf1999 gets 355.2x the views of @radad543210 (1,053,602 against 2,966 for the middle post).

@kalhf1999: Across the 3 of its 183 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 1,053,602 views, close to the average of 1,288,982. The most-viewed post (2,584,182 views) went up on September 8, 2024. The collected posts run from August 21, 2024 to October 25, 2026. Subscribers went from 10,300 on September 13, 2026 to 10,300 on October 25, 2026.

@radad543210: Across the 14 of its 28 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 2,966 views, while the average is 108,712: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 44% of these views. The most-viewed post (667,388 views) went up on September 19, 2024. The collected posts run from August 1, 2024 to October 23, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @kalhf1999 and @radad543210.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.