@foodieonsc vs @jade-angel

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 17 and 30 Spotlight posts we have collected, @foodieonsc averages 448.2K views per post and @jade-angel 37.8K; engagement is 5.79% against 4.72%.

@foodieonsc

FOODIE

@foodieonsc

I’m a foodaholic šŸ˜‹šŸ•šŸ”šŸ«šŸŸ

View full profile →
@jade-angel

Jade Angel

@jade-angel

Shop JadeAngelCosmetics.co.uk šŸ˜‡ HOME OF THE ORIGINAL EASY PEASY DIY LASHES FREE UK SHIPPING! WORLDWIDE AVAILABLE Also on Tiktok Insta YouTube and Fb

View full profile →
@foodieonsc Metric @jade-angel
0 Subscribers 10.9K
17 Spotlight Posts 30
5.8M Total Views 1.1M
448.2K Avg Views / Post 37.8K
3.0M Best Post Views 544.4K
5.79% Engagement Rate (%) 4.72%
0 Subscribers per Post 363

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @jade-angel gets 5.0x the views of @foodieonsc (10,852 against 2,161 for the middle post).

@foodieonsc: Across the 13 of its 17 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 2,161 views, while the average is 448,178: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 51% of these views. The most-viewed post (2,978,848 views) went up on April 19, 2026. The collected posts run from December 4, 2025 to May 22, 2026.

@jade-angel: Across the 28 of its 30 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 10,852 views, while the average is 37,825: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 51% of these views. The most-viewed post (544,429 views) went up on August 26, 2026. The collected posts run from August 20, 2026 to September 8, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @foodieonsc and @jade-angel.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views Ɨ 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.