@dyln_anderson vs @babycheerjoy

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

@dyln_anderson has 61.1K subscribers and @babycheerjoy has 43.1K. Across the 18 and 2 Spotlight posts we have collected, @dyln_anderson averages 239.2K views per post and @babycheerjoy 1.0M; engagement is 8.00% against 1.46%.

@dyln_anderson

Baby Toddler World

@dyln_anderson

Sharing the giggles & growing pains of parenthood👨‍👩‍👧‍👦. Join us for messy fun & heartwarming❤️ moments🤗

View full profile →
@babycheerjoy

SnapSchemers

@babycheerjoy

Bold Pranks, Epic Reactions, Nonstop Laughs!

View full profile →
@dyln_anderson Metric @babycheerjoy
61.1K Subscribers 43.1K
18 Spotlight Posts 2
4.3M Total Views 2.0M
239.2K Avg Views / Post 1.0M
1.7M Best Post Views 2.0M
8.00% Engagement Rate (%) 1.46%
3.4K Subscribers per Post 21.6K

What the posts and readings show

@dyln_anderson: Across all 18 of the Spotlight posts we have collected, the middle post has 16,663 views, while the average is 239,156: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 40% of these views. The most-viewed post (1,730,907 views) went up on February 24, 2024. The collected posts run from January 22, 2024 to June 22, 2024. Subscribers went from 61,100 on September 26, 2026 to 61,100 on October 20, 2026.

@babycheerjoy: Across the 1 of its 2 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 2,046,723 views. The most-viewed post (2,046,723 views) went up on May 12, 2024. Subscribers went from 43,200 on September 27, 2026 to 43,100 on October 22, 2026 (-0.2%).

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @dyln_anderson and @babycheerjoy.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.