@dipalig7212 vs @pastaddicted26

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 39 and 18 Spotlight posts we have collected, @dipalig7212 averages 130.7K views per post and @pastaddicted26 21.0K; engagement is 2.89% against 1.96%.

@dipalig7212

Dipali Agrahari

@dipalig7212

View full profile →
@pastaddicted26

past addicted

@pastaddicted26

View full profile →
@dipalig7212 Metric @pastaddicted26
6.3K Subscribers 0
39 Spotlight Posts 18
4.2M Total Views 314.9K
130.7K Avg Views / Post 21.0K
1.2M Best Post Views 150.2K
2.89% Engagement Rate (%) 1.96%
162 Subscribers per Post 0

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @dipalig7212 gets 2.8x the views of @pastaddicted26 (23,088 against 8,357 for the middle post).

@dipalig7212: Across the 31 of its 39 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 23,088 views, while the average is 134,935: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 29% of these views. The most-viewed post (1,192,182 views) went up on September 13, 2026. The collected posts run from August 23, 2026 to October 20, 2026. Subscribers went from 5,000 on September 29, 2026 to 6,300 on October 24, 2026 (+26.0%).

@pastaddicted26: Across the 15 of its 18 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 8,357 views, while the average is 20,991: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 48% of these views. The most-viewed post (150,176 views) went up on August 3, 2026. The collected posts run from August 3, 2026 to September 1, 2026.

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @dipalig7212 and @pastaddicted26.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.