@adorabilecats vs @cat0snap

Side-by-side Snapchat Spotlight performance comparison.

Across the 18 and 29 Spotlight posts we have collected, @adorabilecats averages 169.8K views per post and @cat0snap 754.3K; engagement is 11.77% against 14.37%.

@adorabilecats

CatLove catlove😊

@adorabilecats

View full profile →
@cat0snap

Cat0snap😽

@cat0snap

All you need is love and a cat😻

View full profile →
@adorabilecats Metric @cat0snap
0 Subscribers 176.4K
18 Spotlight Posts 29
3.1M Total Views 7.5M
169.8K Avg Views / Post 754.3K
923.9K Best Post Views 7.5M
11.77% Engagement Rate (%) 14.37%
0 Subscribers per Post 6.1K

What the posts and readings show

On the typical post, @adorabilecats gets 7.6x the views of @cat0snap (15,707 against 2,072 for the middle post).

@adorabilecats: Across the 17 of its 18 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 15,707 views, while the average is 179,741: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 30% of these views. The most-viewed post (923,862 views) went up on April 29, 2022. The collected posts run from January 21, 2022 to August 5, 2022.

@cat0snap: Across the 9 of its 29 collected Spotlight posts that have a view count, the middle post has 2,072 views, while the average is 838,157: a few big posts lift it, and the most-viewed one holds 100% of these views. The most-viewed post (7,521,699 views) went up on January 4, 2023. The collected posts run from January 4, 2023 to September 29, 2026. Subscribers went from 179,000 on May 14, 2026 to 176,400 on October 24, 2026 (-1.5%).

Each account's full report has its growth chart, posting pattern and top posts: @adorabilecats and @cat0snap.

Methodology: the figures cover the Spotlight posts SnapDataHub has collected for each account, not every post it has made. Averages and the middle (median) post use only posts that came with a view count. Engagement rate = (likes + comments) / views × 100 over the collected posts. Subscriber counts are Snapchat's own; it rounds counts of 1 million or more to the nearest 100,000. How we calculate these numbers.